"We always come here" : investigating the social in social learning

Chris Powis

Abstract


This paper investigates student choices around the 'Third Space' for learning; that which is not either a teaching space or a private space. In mapping the use of such spaces around the University of Northampton's campuses and through the use of semi-structured interviews with students as they use the spaces it constructs a model to help understand why students choose a particular space to work in and influence decisions in the deliberate creation of such spaces in future.

The research shows four, often overlapping, influences on student choice of space; resources, environment, social and emotional. That resource rich spaces that allow social interaction and learning to take place in attractive environments are popular should not be surprising but it is the emotional response to space that is of particular interest. Space attachment theory has usually centred on home or places with religious or national symbolism. This paper identifies an element of emotional resonance to areas of the university campus, especially the library, that will warrant further research.

Keywords


Student Experience; Learning Spaces; Social Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altman, I. (1975) The environment and social behaviour. Monterey: CA: Brooks/Cole Cited in Kimble, C. (1990) Social psychology: studying human interaction. Dubuque: William Brown.

Bourdieu, P. and Saint Martin, M de (1994) The users of Lille University library". In Bourieu, P., Passeron J., and Saint Martin, M. de (1994) Academic discourse. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bruner, J. (2006) In search of pedagogy; the selected works of Jerome S. Bruner. 2 vols. London: Routledge.

PMCid:PMC1856020

Bryant, J. (2007) An ethnographic study of user behaviour in Open3 at the Pilkington Library, Loughborough University. [online] Loughborough University. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2134/3136 (Accessed 22rd April 2009).

Charleston, S. (2009) The English football ground as a representation of home. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29: 144-150.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.002

Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan. Eysenck, M. (ed.) (1998) Psychology: an integrated approach. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

Foster, N., and Gibbons, S. (eds.) (2007) Studying students: the Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Kimble, C. (1990) Social Psychology: studying human interaction. Dubuque: William Brown.

Lowyck, J. Lehtinen E. and Elen, J. (2005) Students" perspectives on learning environment, International Journal of Educational Research, 41, (6): 401-406.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.008

Oblinger, D. (ed.) (2006) Learning Spaces [online] Educause. Available from: www.educause.edu/learningspaces (Accessed 22nd April 2009).

Oldenburg, R. (1989) The Great Good Place. New York: Paragon Books.

Scannell, L. and Gifford, R. (2010) Defining place attachment: a tripartite organizing framework", Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30: 1-10. Shelton Mayes, A. And Stoncel, D. (2008) Students" views on HE learning environments for professional teacher education. AISHE Conference, Encouraging Student Engagement, Maynooth 28 – 29 August. Available from: http://ocs.aishe.org/index.php/international/2008/schedConf/presentations (Accessed 13 September 2010).

Vygotsky, L. (1962) Thought and Language. MIT: Wiley.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11193-000




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v2i1.12